Friday, September 03, 2010  | 
The Regulars

Consider the Pop Tart

by Gordon Gartrell    

 

Growing up, I was a sugar cereal guy for a couple of reasons.  First off, most of these cereals contained a wonderful toy surprise inside.  I would often base my selection on which box housed the best toy.  A baking soda fueled submarine would barely arouse my attention but anything involving an included ripcord and I would plead to mother to buy my new favorite cereal, whatever it was for the week.  Secondly, there is a lot of sugar in those boxes.  Acres and acres of high fructose corn syrup in the form of mouth shredding balls of crunchy goodness.  Apparently they were also chock full of vitamins making my bowl of Sugar Smacks a nutritious part of my balanced breakfast.  This assumes that by nutritious the advertisers really meant diabetes inducing and when they said balanced they realized that they were full of shit – nothing is going to balance out that effect of sugar cereals on your immune system.

 

As I matured into high school, I outgrew my need for disposable plastic entertainment and became much more discerning about what I would consume for breakfast.  Understanding the importance of starting the day with a healthy meal, I turned to the Pop Tart.  As a child I would avoid Apple Jacks and Grape Nuts because they had fruit explicitly in the title and the thought of anything remotely healthy sickened me (Froot Loops was the obvious exception because the word fruit was intentionally and subversively misspelled as if to tell all the fruit in the world to go fuck itself – a message that a 9 year old can comfortably get on board with).  As a more conscientious teenager, I successfully transitioned into someone who embraced fruit, just so long as it was artificial fruit flavoring in a frosting laden pouch of crust.

 

Today, I cannot honestly recall when the last time I even tasted a Pop Tart was and I am pretty sure that my entire adult life has been Pop Tart free.  When you no longer take part in an activity, it often comes as a surprise when you find out that people still partake in said activity.  Pop Tarts had faded away into the latent nether regions of my unconscious and therefore ceased to exist in my world.  Then two moments of interruptive eavesdropping brought them back into relevance. 

 

One day at work, I was busy doing something (probably writing a Culture Voice article) when the two ladies in the cubicle behind me started to raise their voices toward each other.  These two particular women happen to possess a high level of inanity that is only outdone by their supreme social retardation and obliviousness to the fact that there are other people in the universe that aren’t interested in listening to their loud snorts while they are eating pie.  Did I mention that they are both obese?  Not that I am against fat people; I happen to love Santa and late term Marlon Brando.  I think that knowing the girth of these two women is germane to the story, and I’m sure you will soon understand that for yourself.

 

On this day, these two very close friends (they shared a mini-fridge in their cube after all) were having a deliciously banal conversation about snacking.  One suggested that she run to the store and get them both some Pop Tarts.  The other, turned up her snout at the idea and fired back that, “Toaster Strudel is way better than Pop Tarts,” and went back to pounding on her keyboard.  Stunned into a passive aggressive stupor, the Pro Pop Tart lady muttered, “I guess…if you like a flaky mess.”  Now it was on.  For the first time ever being these ladies’ work neighbor, I was interested in one of their conversations.  Not that the content was of any more value than anything else they’ve discussed (though the time when CPS kept calling was a bit intriguing), it was that at least this time, someone might get punched in the face.

 

After a few verbal jabs against each party’s pastry preference, they turned their chairs toward each other to settle it with a series of head shakes and finger points.  They went at it for about 15 minutes with statements like, “I can’t believe you’re sitting there telling me that Pop Tarts are better than Toaster Strudel” and “Toaster Strudel is what Pop Tarts wish they could be.”  On and on it went until they both retreated in silence.  Then the Toaster Strudel fan diffused the tension with a single word: Jimmy.

 

Jimmy was their special word for a conveyance of apathy on any given subject matter.  The etymology of “Jimmy” is this: Legend has it that a blackface minstrel group composed and performed a slavery themed song about a man named Jimmy who was in charge of cracking corn.  Built in the song is the statement, “I don’t care” and it is in response to Jimmy’s cracking of the corn.  Today the song has morphed into a children’s song where we have Jimmy, corn cracking, and lack of caring all without the oppressive notion of slavery.  So there you have the Pop Tart Ladies’ logic.

 

Jimmy crack corn and I don’t care à What Jimmy does = state of indifference à Jimmy himself = I am not caring à “Jimmy” metonymically substitutes for general ennui

 

As if it wasn’t bad enough hearing them ponder such life altering conundrums like “does margarine go bad” or listening to their justifications for endangering their children, I now have to have the word “Jimmy” smattering around the office.  It’s like working with a couple of autistic kids who are constantly looking for their imaginary turtle whose given name was probably James.

 

To this day I don’t know who was more right.  My instinct in terms of food arguments in to go with the preference of the fatter one, but alas there was no clear winner on this day.  And if you want to interpret that last sentence as suggesting there were only two losers, then be my guest.

 

My more recent Pop Tart experience came in a Literary Theory class.  I was sitting behind one of my more peculiar classmates.  He is mostly bland but just odd enough to be worthy of observation.  He sometimes wears glasses, which is a nice distraction from his otherwise vacuous gaze.  He is probably in his early twenties, but is going grey.  He has the kind of 5 o’clock shadow that suggests that he has been shaving since fifth grade and has always looked like a man, but not in a way that was a sexy, “ooh he looks like a men among boys” but more of an “eww, he looks like he’d go bowling with my dad.”  In addition to all that he always wears a hooded windbreaker – enough said.  Apparently, he is smitten with the girl that he always happens to sit next to.  By apparently I mean that it is grossly obvious to anyone who might bother to notice, which I concede is probably only me.

 

This girl is tiny and clearly more interesting than her admirer.  She dresses trendy, cares about her appearance, and swears in a “fucking rad” manner.  She is attractive in a Rosanna Arquette - if the angle is just right kind of way.  They would make a horrible match, at least in terms of coitus because he probably would either start crying or punching or both.  Every class session, he finds a way to engage in a conversation with her and usually it centers on another class they have in common.  On this day, he tried a new way to get her to speak to him, and this is where Pop Tarts come in. 

 

She was eating an individual packet of Pop Tarts that a campus vending machine pooped out.  He was staring longingly at her.  Summoning the necessary courage he fumbled the following attempt at breaking the icing.  “Hmm, I’m trying to figure out the flavor of your Pop Tart, but I can’t see the wrapper.”  Whoa, playa’, settle down.  Let’s not get straight to the pillow talk. 

 

She proceeded to explain that it was only the best flavor ever, brown sugar cinnamon.  It was with that statement that a perceptible change was tangible in the air.  “Mmmm, that is a good one,” he murmured, “but don’t forget about frosted strawberry.”  Without looking up from her morsel, “Yeah, frosted strawberry is pretty good.  But it’s no brown sugar cinnamon.”  Visibly shaken and no doubt filling his windbreaker with cold sweat, he defiantly mumbled, “I don’t know about that.”

 

And with that, it was over.  All wet dreams of her fingers through his salt and pepper hair were shattered as this flavor issue was an irreconcilable difference.  Pop Tart selection is not something to take lightly; it is more of a couple killer than being unequally yoked on whether or not to have children.  This guy knew this and was willing to forego any further advances for the sake of principle.  Even though this hottie was out of his league to the twelfth degree and it would take a liter of Jack Daniels to even get her to look at his wiener, he was pulling the plug.  He wasn’t going to stand by while she essentially said “Jimmy” to his flavor preference.  Let someone else be this girl’s biggest regret, he has his scruples and they are frosted with strawberry not whorish cinnamon.

 

The Pop Tart is still going strong and it will maintain its stranglehold on relationships everywhere, with or with out my complicity.  It doesn’t need me any more; in fact it never needed me.  It was I that needed it.  Like the Pop Tart Ladies in the office or the tart crossed lovers in my classroom, I am a human that will be forever measured by my interactions with the Pop Tart.  It isn’t an issue of for or against, because even if you are pro Pop Tart, you are plagued with the nuanced decisions of flavor, toasted or right out of the packet, before or after your morning cigarette, breakfast only or as a dessert, and so on.  Before you make any more life decisions, I implore you…consider the Pop Tart.

 

 

Musical Musings

by Stephen Ausburne

I like music.  How about that for an opening line?  I consider my musical taste to be eclectic as evidenced by the cacophony of genres dispersed throughout my iPod playlists.  Truth be told, my song selection is rife with the more popular tunes throughout their given eras as opposed to more obscure tracks that make for intriguing coffee house conversation.  Radiohead is about as “out there” as I get.  In my defense, I am not just a top 40 troll, I consider myself a connoisseur of pop and I’d like to share with you some evaluations and observations that I have made throughout the past few decades::

 

The Rick Astley surprise.  I don’t know about you but I had heard Astely’s music before I ever saw Astley the man and when I finally witnessed the phenomenon by virtue of MTV, I thought I was in some sort of Bizarro Universe.  This guy was whiter than me and sounded like Luther Vandross.  Then I saw him dance and I realized that it was only his voice that was an ethnic anomaly. 

 

Ozzy Osbourne’s Crazy Train is one of the most confounding songs I have ever heard.  It starts off menacing enough with a maniacally echoing “All aboard!” followed by some chunky guitar warnings intermingled with creaky sound effects and unintelligible Ozzy noises.  You think you are about to ride the rails with Satan himself until the sinister inexplicably becomes silly as the intro gives way to something up tempo and jig-worthy.  Even when Ozzy comes in with the lyrics, it seems like he is having too much Kenny Logginsesque fun to be taken seriously.  He is less of the Prince of Darkness and more of a cheerleading coach.  And the song is called Crazy Train.  Really?  Crazy Train?  Bonkers Bus didn’t work for the band?  How about Wacky Wings the Absurd Airplane?  But maybe that demonstrates just how crazy Ozzy really is.  You never know what to expect with him.  One minute you’re square dancing and before you realize how it happened, you’re scrubbing his feces from your hair.

 

John Mellencamp is Americana personified.  His songs are like a mixture of apple pie and dirt – sweet, gritty, and palatable if you can get past the dirt.  As the poor man’s Bruce Springsteen, Mellencamp has an astonishing hold over white people.  That said, the man needs a new publicist.  Whoever suggested that he drop the middle name ‘Cougar’ from his moniker must have been fresh off the Crazy Train.  Why would you get rid of the coolest part of your name?  If anything, he should have gone the Seal route, eliminating the first and last name insisting on being called Cougar.  Seriously, what was the thought process in becoming Cougar-free?  Did he think that Cougar was ruining his rock star credibility and that focusing on the name Mellencamp would increase his allure?  Mellencamp is the kind of last name that needs that extra something to distract you from its multisyllabic peculiarity of compound nouns.  Plus the move renders one my earliest jokes as a young boy virtually unusable: Where do John Cougarmelons go during the summer?  (I think you can figure out the punchline).

 

I think that Huey Lewis needs the News more than they need him.

 

Prince is a genius.  I can’t say that I dig every one of his songs, but I can appreciate what he does.  The guy plays 137 instruments and composes all of his music while having intercourse with women that outweigh him by 90 pounds – which is something considering that the average weight of his sexual partners is 110.7 pounds.  Prince is also a controversy machine.  The guy is always pushing the boundaries of the outrageous and just when you think he has exhausted all his options, BAM!  He becomes a Jehovah’s Witness.  You can’t track this guy, he is unpredictable and slippery.  Only Prince is bold enough to go from wearing yellow leather pants with his ass cheeks hanging out to becoming too legalistic to celebrate Halloween.  Brilliant.

 

REM is a tad on the pretentious side.  And by “a tad” I mean grotesquely over the top.  It’s The End of the World As We Know It is awful, like high speed dry humping on a hot engine block kind of awful.  Happy Shiny People makes me want to punch strangers when I hear it.  Orange Crush is nonsense and very difficult to sing on Rock Band.  All those songs would be enough to damn a group to musical Hades (oh I forgot, you already lost your religion so I guess damnation doesn’t apply), but it is Everybody Hurts that puts them over the top to one of the worst bands in the history of life.  I’m sure many a melancholy youth wept while this song played in the background as they cut all the heads off the pictures of their girlfriend of eight weeks who they caught getting felt up by Ted Carter with his perfect hair and school record 40 yard dash time.  If you’re reading this Ted, I hate you.  I bet you don’t have an awesome, albeit almost defunct, webzine.  Sorry, I blacked out for a minute there.  Oh yeah, Everybody Hurts gives the illusion of lyrical depth, but in reality it is something you’d expect from Banality Smith.  It doesn’t actually say anything, and the fact that there is so much emphasis on the line “sometimes” only adds to its absence of significance.

 

Michael Stipe: Hey guys, I have a new killer song I wrote while thinking about people with diseases and stuff.

Nondescript REM guy that isn’t Michael Stipe:  Lay it on us daddy o.

MS: Well you know how everyone experiences pain in some form or another.

NRGTIMS:  Whoa, you’re right.

MS:  Yeah, I just wrote a song about it.  It’s call Everybody Hurts

NRGTIMS:  Dude, the title is so accurate and very difficult to argue against.  But aren’t you afraid of overgeneralizing?  I mean, it isn’t like everybody hurts ALL the time.

MS:  Way ahead of you, I’ve added a caveat.

 

Alanis Morissette captivates me.  I did not particularly care for Ms. Morissette’s music when it first came out; in fact I would shun anyone who claimed to be a fan, mostly because my English major sensibilities were offended by her song Ironic because it is ironically absent of irony.  Then there was that trip to Minnesota with a layover in Denver.  Onboard a 737 from San Francisco on my way to Colorado, there were myriad airline radio stations that I could listen to by plugging headphones into the one armrest I was not forced to share with the mouth breather sitting next to me.  Underwhelmed by the options, I settled on one that was “All Alanis Morissette – All The Time.”  Perhaps she holds a special place in my heart because, while I was nervous to fly, she kept me company with her mysterious Canadian ways, as if cradling me in her angst ridden arms and telling me that everything was going to be alright.  Whatever the reason, she now makes my list of my musical musings amongst all the other things that I think that you, you, you oughta know.

 

 

 
Project Runway for Writers
                I have a sick fascination for reality TV (admit it: you do too). I tell myself that it’s okay because I don’t like the really bad stuff (Jon & Kate: Die Now!), just the slightly bad stuff. But whereas the average American home between the hours of eight and ten p.m. on a weeknight is a kind of victim to whatever is on, I consciously choose it. I put the stuff in my Netflix queue for freak’s sake. I envision a couple interns in cubicles at Netflix headquarters laughing their asses off at my most recent updates. They probably think I throw the intelligent-sounding stuff in for looks only. They wouldn’t be entirely wrong. For every arty flick with subtitles, I watch six things I’d cringe to admit to (13 Going on 30…just watched it for the second time). Recent obsession consumed: Project Runway Season 5. I have little fashion sense and even less ability to design clothing but I love this show. I love to watch the designers work so hard on something they’ve dreamed about and then to see how they handle the feedback session during the judging. I also get sucked into the ego wars, the drama that inevitably unfolds from sleep deprivation, close proximity and being human.
                For those who have not succumbed to the lure of the show, allow me to paint a basic picture: a bunch of designers, culled from countless applicants, compete for the honor of having a collection shown at New York Fashion Week (for those in the know, you probably just heard Heidi Klum’s voice in your head). One or two are booted each week based on their performance in daily challenges such as making dresses out of car parts, designing for a drag queen, or out of whatever they can find in a supermarket in 10 minutes. The judges weigh in, not mincing words, and one or more goes home at the end of the challenge until finally we arrive at one overall winner who is set up with all they’ll need for about a year of running their own business and a launch of a career in something they love. 
                I have tried to come up with some equivalent idea for writers so that I finally have an excuse to try out for a reality TV show. (I refuse to compete with a gaggle of skinny women for one man—at least while televised. I feel like I already do that enough in real life). So, here’s what I propose:
                Fifteen writers in various genres (pre-qualification: less than 2 books out) compete for the title of Most Awesome Author, or something like that. Each week has a new challenge: one will be to write a short story underwater, another to speed-read a chapter from their work in progress in Pig Latin out loud, and another where they have to work in teams of two (these challenges are always particularly fraught with tension and drama) to write a prose poem involving guacamole, chair legs and a llama. The guest judges will be currently celebrated best-selling authors and the final competition will involve writing an entire novella in less than 48 hours. Longhand.
                If there’s one thing I know it’s that when you put a group of writers in a room together, egos flare (and don’t even get me started about the collective neuroses). And yes, some of the women may be found to compete with the rarely occurring good looking, socially-skilled man-writer amongst them. It’s not pretty, but it makes for good entertainment.
                But, then again, writers as a whole aren’t necessarily an attractive bunch (I mean, if you really do write a lot, well then you are also sitting on your ass a lot), in fact they can be rather doughy as a group.  There would have to be drinking, otherwise no one will really open up about how person X hates person Y and why. The ego tends to get a bit more forthcoming about its motivation when the booze starts flowing. There will be at least one Fitzgerald-aspiring drunk, and one Sylvia Plath-esque type who acts slit-wristy at the slightest criticism. Groups of them will gang up on the one so blatantly trying to follow in Stephen King’s footsteps, screaming about commercialism and true art while bemoaning student loans. And the blogger in the group will likely get flogged in his sleep.  
                Alright, I admit there isn’t much traction to my idea. If it’s anything like my MFA program, there will be inappropriate relationships and much posturing which isn’t exactly a new idea for reality TV. We writers will just have to go on plugging away at our computers or pads of paper, stripped of a soundtrack or glamour. It’s probably better this way: I will never have to watch a show of people competing for an opportunity I want, meanwhile hating them in their success. Not that I’m like that or anything. We should leave the humiliation up to the Jons and Kates in the world and stick to the serious business of brooding and staring out windows.

 

Katie Burke

Competition’s Payin’ the Price (Mama Said Knock You Out)

 

"You can't just beat a team; you have to leave a lasting impression in their minds so they never want to see you again." -Mia Hamm

I was hanging out with my friend Jenny, a mild-mannered gal with straight red hair and a gentle smile. I suggested that we play a board game, and Jenny agreed. Several minutes later, I was wracked with anxiety and green with envy: Jenny had already located and sunk my battleship and my aircraft carrier, and the only thing of hers I'd taken down was her puny submarine.

When Jenny landed one of her pegs in the front of my destroyer, I undertook desperate measures. Under the auspices of wanting to show her something that couldn't wait until the game's conclusion, I lured Jenny into my closet. I followed her inside and shut the door, so that we would be safely hidden from anyone else's view. And then I did what I contend any rational Battleship would-be loser would do: I punched Jenny in the stomach.

In my defense, I was six years old.

I learned the technique of guerilla sucker punching from my two older brothers. In response to complaints that my male classmates wouldn't let me play soccer with them during recess, my brothers showed me how to rule the playground. They took me into my closet and shut the door, so that our parents could not possibly know or suspect that we were doing anything of which they would disapprove.

Despite the exceedingly clear warning signal that a closed-door sibling meeting actually sends to parents, my brothers and I somehow stole several minutes of uninterrupted stomach-punching tutorials, which included demonstrations and hands-on practice, much to the chagrin of Harvey, my giant stuffed rabbit.

I kicked Harvey's ass up and down my closet floor, pounding his stuffed gut with

the indomitable fury of an athlete scorned. An onlooker might be led to believe that Harvey had personally excluded me from the European Football Championship finals. And though the boys on the schoolyard mysteriously capitulated the next day, allowing me to play soccer without my having to ball a fist (did Harvey rat me out?), the punching lessons weren't wasted. There was always Jenny. 

Jenny, with her infuriating Battleship prowess.

I would love to report that I've matured since those days, that I've outgrown the behaviors that prompt children to scream for their parents from behind body-blocked closet doors. Alas, it was but two months ago that I scorched my opponents in Marco Polo, catching myself at one point yelling, "No fair! You can't do that, cheater!"

Never mind that I was the only one in the pool older than eight. Rules are rules, and that little punk was way out of bounds.

In spite of its obvious downsides, my competitive spirit has shaped me into quite the desirable teammate. None of my friends can deny that my passion keeps games wildly entertaining and nail-bitingly suspenseful. Indeed, 28 years after I terrorized sweet Jenny - and pummeled the cotton out of Harvey - I can finally lay claim to my popularity on the soccer field, in living rooms on board game night, and pretty much everywhere except the closet.

But I think it's safe to say that Jenny, for one, never wants to see me again. 


 

Facebook Saved my Marriage
 
It wasn’t so long ago that my relationship with my wife was teetering toward irreconcilable disaster. I readily confess that it had more to do with my issues and ultimately my inability to be present for my family. I was allowing nonsexual extramarital endeavors to consume my free time and energy. Let me explain.
 
I have a lot of friends, some that I am currently in touch with and others that are from my past and therefore not as accessible. I am an exceptionally loyal person and I do not fall for the lies we convince ourselves are true in regard to friendships fading away due to circumstances like changes in geography, ideologies, prison sentences, etc. It has always been a high priority for me to keep up with the happenings of anyone and everyone that has ever blessed me with their friendship. Having moved from place to place, school to school, I left a wake of splintered relationships that command my vigilant attention. My wife knew this going into our marriage, but after years of sharing me with people she thought were superficial trappings, the emotional levee was about to break. Fortunately, an angel invented Facebook and now I am set free.
 
You see, before Facebook, I would spend hours combing through my Junior High yearbooks and tapping into government files in order to find contact information for my dear old chums. Then I would be compelled to catch up with them in a very real way – not just some passing conversation, but authentic meaningful reacquainting. We would start with small talk but then we would transition to hours of information gathering:
 
  • I would ask a series of questions in order to find out which household appliance they would be and/or which Muppet best represents them.
  • I’d ask them to name five bands they’ve seen in concert.
  • If they would kidnap me, where would their hideout be and could they tell me some interesting cultural facts about said hideout?
  • What television shows are they a fan of?
  • If I poked them, would they poke me back?
And the list goes on. This would take most of my time, but the payoff was glorious (did you know that Suzie Mitchell would be a toaster? A toaster!). As rewarding as this was for me and my hundreds of best friends, it was tearing my family apart.  Until Facebook came around. Now, I have a library of besties who keep me up to date with everything that is going on in their lives. With a scroll of a mouse I can see baby pictures, high scores in games that are lot like Scrabble but just different enough to avoid IP related lawsuits, get invites to events seven states away, and find out who is now gay. I also have a virtual farm.
 
What used to take hours, now still takes hours, but I’m able to sit at my computer and be within earshot of whatever my family is doing. Thanks to my Facebook app on my iPhone, I’m able to keep up with my pals when we’re on the road so I am never without the necessary updates that keep me connected with the most important people in my life – everybody I’ve ever sort of known.

 

Antisocial Networking
 
The current trend of having a Facebook profile has given way to an even trendier fad – being a Gen Xer who turns their nose up at Facebook. I know a great many people my age who think that Facebook is a colossal waste of time and only serves the purpose of fostering superficial relationships. Yet these are the same folk who go to church functions, after school events, and work socials to perform the same ritualistic fakeness only live and in person, as if looking someone in the eye and pretending to care about their weekend plans is somehow more honorable than secretly hiding their annoying updates on Facebook. If anything Facebook gives you an out from these kinds of awkward situations. 
 
Facebook gives you hide and ignore features that I wish were available in real life. If only I could hide away the droning people I meet who ask you how your summer has been going only because they know that you’ll reciprocate and ask them the same question so they can tell you all about their family camping trip where little Timothy caught his first fish and then shit the sleeping bag and blah blah blah. In a party atmosphere, the only hiding we can accomplish is the fake cell phone call or grabbing someone else and forcing them to pretend to talk to you so Timmy’s mom will go bother someone else. The ignore feature is even better. Someone asks to confirm that you are indeed their friend and you can either accept or ignore. Imagine if someone asked if you would like to tell the world that you are friends and instead of saying anything to them you just pretended like they weren’t there. 
 
“Honey, is there someone at the door?”
“Nope.”
“It sounded like it was your old classmate from the community college photoshop class.”
“Nope, nobody there.”
“But I can see him in our driveway crying.”
“I don’t see anyone. I’m going to go poke your sister.”
 
No confrontation, just hiding or ignoring, brilliant. I actually don’t ignore requests all that often. The fact is, our lives are already filled with people that think we actually like them, and if Facebook gives these losers the illusion that people actually care about them, then who am I to deprive them their last bit of foolish hope? I have over 200 friends on Facebook and maybe twelve that I actually give a rip about, the rest are people that I check in on periodically strictly in pursuit of beloved schadenfreude.
 
Sometimes people from the past want to catch up and hang out so we could relive old times. Sure, let’s do it just like we did when we were younger. We can meet up at a bar. I’ll be there with all my real friends, you can wander up to me and pretend we have some sort of commonality (i.e. you let me borrow your Right Guard in P.E. once), and then I will pretend to be interested in you.  Then when you go to buy a round of beers, I’ll do an unflattering impersonation of you complete with lazy eye and nervous laugh. It’ll be great, give me an event invitation so I will get the notification.
 
Don’t get me wrong, there are definitely some people that I am legitimately curious about and I look forward to finding out about their current situations. Facebook can be a wonderful way to keep in touch with classmates who have drifted away due to family or work relocations. I get to correspond with friends and relatives in other states and countries as well as see pictures of their children. I understand some of the criticism that it might not be a completely value added networking tool, but I think that if most thirty somethings would sit down and search the database for old friends, they would soon feel the sense of satisfaction that I do when I find out how much better I still am than most of the people I knew. And thinner.
 
The point is that Facebook at worst is a time waster and at best is a modern method to create community. Most of the people I know probably only claim to dislike Facebook because it reveals the lack of substantial relationships in their lives; it isn’t that Facebook perpetuates superficiality, it exposes it. I, for one, am a realist and choose to embrace it and am willing to allow the technology to guide me through a sea of familiar, albeit puffier, faces. 

 

The Most Overrated List, Part 1
(actually, the list itself is fine)
            The ironic thing about creating a list of the most overrated people or things is that two of the most overrated things are lists and awards (which are really just very abbreviated lists [or lists are extended awards]). People get so excited about awards in general thinking that some sort of injustice has been thrust on the world when the wrong movie wins the Academy Award or the wrong song wins the Grammy or the wrong ballplayer wins the MVP. Really, the only significant thing these established awards or lists do is boost egos. For instance, when No Country for Old Men won the Academy Award, it validated the opinion of those who thought that NCFOM was the best movie of the year. But let’s say you thought that There Will Be Blood was the best movie. You can boost your ego when you argue why your favorite movie is better than the one that won. After all, you know better than the Academy, right?
For instance, I know that I am more knowledgeable than the voters of the Baseball MVP since I’m positive that Ozzie Smith should have won the NL MVP in 1987 over Andre Dawson. Yes, if you were to compare offensive statistics, you might infer that Dawson looks more impressive. But how valuable is a player if his team finishes in last place? Would they not finish in last place without him as well? But the Cardinals made it to game 7 of the World Series and would not have done so without Ozzie Smith. This is hardly disputable. Therefore, Smith was more valuable. Q.E.D. Because I can argue this, proving to myself and those who will listen 22 years after the fact, the MVP award has succeeded in making me feel better about myself. Q.E.D.
            With that in mind, I realize that I am treading into problematic meta-waters even by attempting to compile a list of the most overrated people in their respective fields. And I am open to criticism. This is not a definitive list.
            One more caveat. What does it mean to be overrated? I think it means, in my mind, that undue adulation or attention is directed towards a person or that it is taken for granted that the person is great in his or her field.
            Oh, alright, one more caveat. It may be that I am unable to recognize a person’s greatness and I am making grave errors in judgment based on a lack of education or understanding. I’ll accept this, but part of my reasons for making such an error stems from the fact that I don’t want to educate myself on someone that I feel is overrated. Why waste my time on something that doesn’t warrant my attention? So without further ado, the first three entries on my most overrated list:
1. Ernesto Che Guevara. Once, in Vancouver, I had gone for a walk in my new neighborhood to find some coffee. Of the two on the block I was on, the locally owned one had closed for the evening, so I ordered a cup at Starbucks. I was reading outside and a guy sat down next to me with a Starbucks cup, wearing a Che t-shirt. It seemed a strange scene. I asked him about his shirt and he said he got it in Cuba.
The reason Che is overrated is partly to do with the fact that people regularly wear his iconic face on their chests while doing things that fly in the face of his entire program—like patronize capitalist enterprises that acquire their wares by exploiting impoverished workers in the global south. That’s the obvious reason.
            The less obvious reason is that I think it can be safe to say that most of the people who choose to display their affinity towards Che likely don’t realize how ideologically different he is to most progressives in the developed world. In fact, you could probably find more in common between Che and Dick Cheney than Che and Dennis Kucinich (Hell, you can’t spell Cheney without Che). Che and Cheney favor violence to achieve political goals (and one of those goals might actually be violence). They are not what you would call civil libertarians and lean towards a police state once power is secured. Economically, Che might have thought the no bid contracts awarded to Halliburton and KBR in Iraq sounded pretty close to something he might consider. At best he is a complex figure, but that hardly befits his becoming an icon.
            In short, the face of Che that liberals like to display has as much to do with Ernesto Guevara as the cross around Ann Coulter’s neck has to do with the self-sacrificial crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus Christ. They are convenient symbols for ideologies the signified could hardly recognize.
2. Andy Warhol. One night several years ago a group of friends and I met at the art gallery to check out an Andy Warhol exhibit. I went to hang out with my friends, not for the art. The whole idea of having an Andy Warhol exhibit struck me as weird. Here was a guy who chose to do his art by silkscreen so that he could produce multiple copies of the same work as fast as possible. It was possible that nothing we saw at that exhibit would qualify as an original. But then, what is an original Warhol?
            I’m not convinced Warhol had the same view of art as the people who touted him as a genius thought he did. The more I hear about him, the more I think of “Chauncey Gardiner” from Being There. “Chance the gardener” would say mundane or silly things, but because some deemed him a political genius, everyone interpreted his obvious statements on gardening as profound metaphors for public policy and philosophy. In comparison, Warhol’s most famous line has been taken to mean something I’m not sure is in the original phrase or context. What people generally say he said was, “Everyone has fifteen minutes of fame.” Joe the Plumber, for instance, is said to have received “his fifteen minutes” which is shorthand for this famous quip. But here is the original line: “In the future, everyone will be famous for 15 minutes.” Does this actually mean anything? Forget the fact that it’s not remotely true, it’s also so vague he might as well have said, “First comes the Spring, then comes Summer, then Fall, and then Winter… and then Spring again.”
Reading through his most famous quotes is like reading through a transcript of “Kids say the darndest things.” Maybe they’re profound and maybe they’re not. But I’m not convinced the mind of Andy Warhol has anything to do with their profundity. Seriously, read through these quotes and then through these and tell me if any of them couldn’t be switched from one website to another without people noticing.
            So what about the art itself? I’m no expert in art by any means, but I have been to several memorable exhibits including those of de Vinci, Titian, Pissarro, Picasso, Monet, Rothko, and Emily Carr. All of those struck me in some way, either emotionally or intellectually. Warhol’s did not. Nor have I ever heard anyone wax eloquently about his style, explaining what I missed or what he contributed to the art world. Some say that he was critiquing the modern era almost as if he were a satirist. But if that were the case, then why did he spend so much time promoting himself, hanging out with celebrities, or talking about the importance of wealth in his life? He was an attention whore.
            So maybe he is not overrated at all but succeeded at exactly what he wanted. He wasn’t interested in making good art. He was just Thomas Kincade of the previous generation. But this is not the pedestal he has been put on and that is the one upon which he is overrated.
3. Joe Namath. Speaking of attention whores. Broadway Joe’s fame is easily explained. He was the quarterback on a fluke champion from the largest television market in the country whose best player since then was Freeman McNeil.
            Namath played 13 years and had a single season where he threw more touchdown passes than interceptions—19-17 in 1969, the year of his highest quarterback rating of 74.3. His career totals give us a 50.1% completion percentage, 173:220 touchdown to interception ratio, a 65.5 passer rating, and 140 rushing yards. And his most proficient seasons were in the inferior league of the AFL. He was the first to pass more than 4000 yards in a season, but was hardly the last. It’s a milestone he now shares with 39 others, including Lynn Dickey, Neil Lomax, and Brian Sipe. Who? Exactly.
            And he parleyed that turd into a Hall of Fame bid? Here’s what the Hall says about him: “…during his 13-year tenure from 1965 through 1977 he was one of the game's most exciting, proficient and publicized quarterbacks. Namath's place in history was assured with his first pro football act, the signing of a reported $400,000 contract early in 1965…” Great, he was famous and made lots of money. Those are two of the reasons he’s in the Hall.
            Okay, sure, you say. But what about Super Bowl III? He guaranteed victory over Johnny Unitas and the mighty Colts and then delivered! It was a huge underdog victory. He won when it counted. That’s more than we can say for Dan Marino! Plus his disheveled mane triggered the impulse in Homer Simpson’s mom to leave her husband. Let’s look closer at that game, then shall we.
            Namath was adequate I suppose. He completed 60% of his passes for 206 yards, none for a touchdown and one for an interception. The starting quarterback for the Colts on the other hand basically gave the game away, going 6 for 17 with zero touchdowns and three interceptions. “Johnny U had that bad of a game?” you ask. No, Unitas went 11 for 24 after Earl Morrall shat on the field. That’s right, Unitas came off the bench because he had been injured. But Namath out-duelling the long-forgotten Earl Morrall doesn’t really keep the legend alive as well as the flashy Broadway Joe showing up the workman veteran Johnny U.
            So there you have it. Three fields, three people unworthy to be mentioned as greats in those fields. I’m sure there’s more to be said and I’m sure people can defend these winners of the Legend Lottery, but life’s too short to get too worked up over such weak sauce.

 

A Defense of Tavern Poetry

by Gordon Gartrell

 

The movie Cocktail is, of course, a classic example of the media of film in its most perfect incarnation.  I state this obvious fact only to demonstrate my credibility as one who understands and appreciates fine art.  While the mere mention of the Tom Cruise vehicle will no doubt invoke images of gin bottles spinning through the air and the now legendary side boob shot of Elisabeth Shue under a waterfall, there is yet another element of Cocktail that I will choose to recognize: Cruise’s poetry.  At one point in the film, Cruise’s character is asked to recite an impromptu poem from behind the bar and this is what he delivers:

 

The Last Barman Poet

 

I am the last barman poet

I see America drinking the fabulous cocktails I make.

Americans getting stinky on something I stir or shake.

The sex on the beach, the schnapps made from peach,

The Velvet Hammer, the Al-La-Bam-A Slam-a!

 

I make things with juice and froth: the Pink Squirrel, the 3-Toed Sloth

I make drinks so sweet and snazzy:

The Iced Tea, the Kamikaze,

The Orgasm, The Death Spasm,

The Singapore Sling, the Ding-a-Ling.

 

America, you’re just devoted to every flavor I got.

But if you want to get loaded,

Why don’t you just order a shot?

 

If you only see the movie once, not only will you be depriving yourself of more opportunities to soak in the brilliantly nuanced screenplay and performances, but you might not fully absorb the poetic genius.  On paper, the poem is almost perfect in every way, but when you take the time to actually listen to Cruise recite it you will begin to understand how important the oral tradition is to poetry. 

 

His passionate enunciation of what would normally be pronounced “the Alabama Slammer” demonstrates that he is in full control of both language as well as his audience’s emotions.  Cruise also does some lovely tongue work when he hits the words “sweet and snazzy.”  He manufactures an accent rife with upper class snobbery that is simultaneously cocksure and uproariously hysterical.  Perhaps he saves his absolute best for when he slowly utters, “the Orgasm,” in such a way that he illustrates the primal gravity of his subject yet also mimics function with form by drawing out the word to achieve maximum satisfaction.  It is as if he having sexual intercourse with the ears of every man and woman in the audience; penetrating their faces with his bulbous vocabulary.  I admit that I was more than willing to offer my consent when sitting in the movie theater. I sat there prone, Goose to his Maverick, ready to fly into the Danger Zone.

 

Basking in the rhyme scheme that was The Last Barman Poet is not where the journey through verse ends.  As you travel to the islands with Mr. Cruise you can hear the faint sounds of the Beach Boys who, along with Uncle Jesse from Full House, will lull you into a trancelike state with the lucid confession:

 

Aruba, Jamaica, oooh I wanna take ya”

 

If you are still wearing pants by the time those steel drums play, then my friend, you must have been born without functioning genitalia – or at least Jamie Lee Curtis style bad wiring.

 

On a side note, you have to admire a group of sixty year olds who still refer to themselves as “boys” but I guess you can’t expect too much clarity from a group whose front man was batshit insane.

 

Cocktail is more than a film that contains moments of poetry – the film is poetry.  One day when sitting backstage of Inside the Actor’s Studio, James Lipton and I were discussing Cocktail and its various merits.  James and I were equally yoked in our admiration of the film though he seemed to miss the overall significance of the inclusion of Cruise’s poetic asides.  I attempted to explain to him how a poet lurks in each and every one of us, and how the release of Cruise’s inner artist simultaneously betrayed the image of a spirit slinger and philanderer while it revealed a complexity far too often ignored by himself and others.  I went on to expound how Cruise’s vocational conflict mirrored his complicated existence as committed lover and ladies’ man, but Lipton was not grasping the concept.  Lipton is seldom in the right mind to be reasoned with because of his hard headed nature, though on this particular night I blame his stubbornness on the fact that he was high on crack cocaine and had just killed a prostitute.

 

In the movie, it was Cruise’s passion to open up his own bar called “Cocktails and Dreams” which is apropos – he’d serve you cocktails as elixirs for the moment while his poetry conjured up dreams to remind you that life is worth living.  The cocktails may pass through, but the dreams linger on in a way that you just can’t shake.  Even with the Hippy Hippy Shake.

 

Wherefore Art Thou Alex P. Keaton?

by Stephen Ausburne

 

Has the television show made a comeback?  I ask this as someone who has not had cable for over 5 years and does not regularly watch TV.  Let me be clear, I’m not your “Kill Your Television” bumper sticker adorning sort, but I do think that I am better than you regular TV viewing folk.  It isn’t just my opinion either, science will back me up.  To call my bluff you could go on the internet to look up the statistical justification for why I am better than you but that would require you to tear yourself away from the latest episode of Discovery Channel’s hit show, Man Vs. Villains From 18th Century British Literature (my money is on the cannibals from Robinson Crusoe, they will straight up eat your ass).  As it stands, I am superior because I am no slave to the boob tube – which has a lot more boobs these days I’m told.

 

Back to my question about whether or not the TV show is suddenly relevant again.  I realize that there have been myriad shows that have been deemed “must see” for years.  People have been watching on a consistent basis even though I haven’t been, so something had to be on.  I did follow Seinfeld regularly (own every episode on DVD) and I now catch the Office and 30 Rock on Hulu so I am definitely not opposed to television in its entirety.  Ultimately it’s the commercials that I have no patience for, and now internet viewing and DVD purchasing affords me the opportunity to be very selective and efficient in what I watch.  I understand that reality television has certainly taken the world by storm and I overhear coworkers discussing the talented people of America that must first pass the scrutiny of master thespian, Sir David Hasselhoff – he was knighted right?  Well he should be.  That said, there seems to be, at least in my circle of friends (both real and those on Facebook) a flurry of recommendations for what I should be doing with my down time.  Most of which involve the shows found on HBO and Showtime where anything goes, and often does. 

 

I, with the aid of my Netflix pusher, got addicted to The Sopranos during its last season.  I was watching up to three episodes a night and I couldn’t get enough of it even though I recognize it was essentially a modern day Dallas with nudity and F-bombs.  I am now dabbling into Dexter thanks to Netflix Instant Watch and I fear I might be hooked.  Now I’m being told that I absolutely have to watch Mad Men and the fact that Culture Voice now has two reviews on it almost surely cinches it.

 

Interesting to note that these shows all revolve around exceptionally flawed protagonists.  I use the term protagonist only because that’s what my conventional TV show watching sensibilities tell me to call Tony Soprano, Dexter Morgan, and Donald Draper.  In actuality, they are more of the antihero variety.  I grew up with the Heathcliff Huxtables, Ricky Strattons, and the guys from Full House, so I have delusions of sitcom sweetness.  These new guys are like taking the scoundrel Dan Fielding from Night Court and making his ancillary escapades the primary focus of hour long weekly romps. 

 

Looking back, the television landscape was littered with flawed characters leading the way like Mike Seaver, Sam Malone, and the nefarious Myposian terrorist Balki Bartokomous.  Unlike the modern human monsters, these guys always learned their lesson in at least thirty minutes so redemption was always attainable.  These new guys not only seem void of salvation, they don’t even seem to be interested in it.  It is like deliverance is not even an option.  Bastards.

 

So what is it about these characters that make us tune in?  I thought television was supposed to be some form of escapism that transported us to mystical locations where everybody knows our name, to far off lands where people thank us for being a friend, to enchanted places where streaks on the China never mattered before.  Now it seems that our options are watching reality show wannabes with trainwreck lives or fictional assholes that we can’t seem to turn away from.  I’m sure this says something about our society and how we are deteriorating morally, but I’m not convinced.  Perhaps we’ve matured as humans and we are making strides at understanding the sick people we encounter throughout this fallen world and these shows provide us some insight in the psyches of the men and women we would have otherwise previously drawn away from. 

 

Whatever the answer, I do know that I still love it when Simon Cowell makes some poor white trash cry.  

 

Mommas Don’t let your Babies Grow up to be Grammarians

 by C.C. O’Lorin

 The other day my friend pined on about how he’d like to become a grammarian. Just in case you didn’t already know how nerdy I actually am, this is the kind of company I keep. Said friend has professional acumen in the philosophy of language but spends his free time working out the correct usage of lay versus lie. I know how that sounds, but he’s actually not that… yes he is. In fact he holds court among the upper echelon of dork royalty. I’m even worse; I’m not nearly as dorky but aspire to be dorkier.

 

As he dreamily spoke his wish into possibility, I slapped his pretty, little mouth.  I immediately rebuked him, thinking only of his wellbeing. You see, I am not a grammarian, but I dabble. From what I can see, grammarians are among the most miserable people on the planet. The only folks more miserable are hazmat rookies and libertarians. Choosing the path of a grammarian is the path of pain.

 

You see, informal language dominates the human experience. So much so that we see the world through grammar colored glasses. We create mental categories based on phonetics, word associations, and unbeknownst connotations. Grammar is ubiquitous. And yet, most of us commoners grammatize incorrectly most of the time. For instance, I count two grammar errors in the above three paragraphs that could be avoided if I wasn’t worried about sounding stilted. And I wish to God that I wasn’t aware of this.

 

Grammarians are faced with incorrect grammar at every turn: common speech, emails, twitter, not to mention television, talk radio, and newspaper journalism. The grammarian cannot watch major sporting events without constant distraction (sans games called by Jon Miller, who might be the most intelligent man alive). Until very recently, White House briefings were grammatical train wrecks. For years grammarians would simply ignore the Washington sideshow. But during Sarah Palin’s five minutes, the grammarian suicide rate jumped to 79%—the highest since Red Barber passed.

 

Faced with this constant and violent affront to our most foundational hermeneutic, grammarians are left with only two choices: (1) become silently superior, or (2) become assholes. There is a third option but it involves a combination of one and two and is too grotesque to mention.

 

The first option renders one helplessly alien to his fellow man. While others will croon alongside U2 in Barcelona, the grammarian will stand aloof, parsing Bono’s lyrics. While her girlfriend offers a heartfelt toast at her wedding, the grammarian will be distracted by her friend’s use of an adjective where an adverb was warranted. While others read training manuals for their new job, grammarians will circle typos while lamenting the unfortunate soul who wrote the thing.

 

The second option basically involves correcting people’s poor grammar and ensuring that grammarians are hated far and wide. This has been true as long as language moved past the grunting stage. But for a recent example, take a look at the facebook group called “I Judge You When You Use Poor Grammar”. There is no better example of the adage that misery loves company. Even my friend who aspires to be a grammarian called these folks, and I quote, “assholes”.

 

Neither option available to the grammarian is beneficial for society; both are detrimental to one’s spiritual health. So do us all a favor, dorks of the world! Focus your sickness upon LOTR, or Planet of the Apes, or Pauline theology, or grappling hook lore. Dress yourself as a Ferengi or as a Confederate soldier. Do not choose the path of pain. Grammar won’t never get you what your yearning for.  

 

Dr. Dagmar Schroeter has responded to this essay:

I don’t have much to say in response to Dr. O’Lorin. However, he should be aware that the pluperfect would have been a better choice in the second to last sentence of the third paragraph. It presently reads: “For instance, I count two grammar errors in the above three paragraphs that could be avoided if I wasn’t worried about sounding stilted.”

My suggestion is set in bold face font: “For instance, I count two grammar errors in the above three paragraphs that could be have been avoided if I wasn’t worried about sounding stilted.”

Also, what is this rubbish about grappling hook lore? Other than that, I quite liked this essay.

 

 

Cobra Commander Destroyed My Penis

by Stephen Ausburne

 

A while back, an article was submitted by friend of Culture Voice, Dr. Anthony Le Donne, discussing circumcision.  The good doctor brought up some interesting things to consider when contemplating the social, medical, and religious values of “taking a little off the top.”  I find it a fascinating topic and have thought long and hard (pun regrettably intended) on the issue and have come to what I think is a profound discovery. 

 

It is convenient to blame the God of the Old Testament for the ritual maiming of infants, but I can’t comfortably say that Yahweh deserves all the ire from the pro-foreskin contingent.  Don’t get me wrong, God is ultimately to blame for everything (the buck has to stop somewhere) but I would suggest that over time, a different figurehead has taken the lead on leading a culture toward dong dinging.  The culprit is none other than Cobra Commander.

 

For those of you too Baby Booming to know who Cobra Commander is, in GI Joe lore he is the leader of Cobra, a sinister team of militaristic baddies hell-bent on global domination.  Obviously, the cobra is the ideal metaphor for an oppressive patriarchal system – it’s deadly, efficient, and strikes fear in the heart of all its prey.  It is also the ideal metaphor for the actual members of said patriarchy.  By members I mean penises.  When agitated, the cobra rises from a flaccid state, its head swells, and, in some cases, spits.  I think you get the idea and I will spare you further embarrassment of reading why snakes are like phalluses. 

 

As for the Commander himself, he was the primary nemesis to the GI Joe team and ultimately the brains behind the terrorist organization.  As any young Gen X-er will tell you he was highly recognizable as a fixture in just about every episode of GI Joe and provided a bit of evil comic relief.  Cobra Commander was a staple of any youngster’s regular television diet in the 1980’s.  His visage came in two familiar flavors and here is where we get to the circumcised agenda hidden within the animated series. 

 

When Cobra Commander was out on the battlefield, he sported a shiny helmet and chrome faceplate.  This was his “man about warzone” attire and was most definitely the more prevalent of his two modes of facial concealment.  His second look was that of the dark blue hood.  This was what he wore when he was lurking deep within the bowels of Cobra Island and provided him a more menacing appearance.  Clearly we see the perpetuation of circumcision as the social norm at work within the cartoon universe*. 

 

*On a side note, I am referencing the animated series as opposed to the comic book legends, due to the fact that I have never read the comics.  If you are a hardcore GI Joe the comic fan and take umbrage with my treatment of the canon, I apologize but suggest that it doesn’t really matter if I’ve caused you to stop reading this article – mostly because if you are a hardcore comic book fan, the state of your penis will be forever irrelevant.  Good luck with your unintentional perpetual celibacy.

 

The implications for penile preference are so obvious they almost go without any need for expounding, but given my inability to leave well enough alone coupled with my over appreciation for my explanatory gifting I will break it on down for the masses.

 

When Cobra Commander is out in public, making the rounds, and attempting to be more socially acceptable, he is adorned with the symmetrical shiny helmet.  When he is hidden away and invoking more fear and disgust, he is rocking the droopy hood.  Simply put: helmet = good, hood = friggin’ awful.  As you have no doubt surmised, the circumcision like helmeted version of Cobra Commander is much preferred to the misshapen mass of material that is his hood of horribleness. 

 

Thanks to the brain trust behind the GI Joe cartoon, millions of young men entered communal showers in their public schools only to embrace their helmeted brethren and shun the hooded freaks.  For those of you wondering about how circumcision became the dominant American practice, now you know.  And knowing is half the battle.

 

 

Michael Jackson’s Legacy: Talented, Troubled, or Just Plain Vile
 
The passing of Michael Jackson will bring with it an onslaught of retrospectives. We will be treated to numerous shots of the young star and his brethren entertaining audiences with their high pitched wailings and smooth moves. Now that he is gone we will be tempted to recognize him solely for his musical genius and his contributions to pop culture. We will want to remember the good times and be free to celebrate his career and lament the passing of an icon and legend. We will see the glove, the moonwalk, the Thriller video, and Bubbles the chimp. We will also no doubt see the crotch grabbing, the car smashing, baby dangling, and the allegations. The fact is that Michael Jackson was a hell of a performer but that ought not be his legacy. You see, when you are a pedophile – that trumps all. Pure and simple. 
 
I suggest that we should hold off on our mourning and take an objective look at what he has left behind.
 
We were like the proverbial frog in the pot of boiling water with this guy. He surrounded himself with zoo animals – we thought “how quirky.” We saw him getting plastic surgery to look like Diana Ross – we shrugged. Elephant Man’s bones – “oh that King of Pop, what will he do next?” White skin, more plastic surgery – sure he looks like a fetal kitten, but he did have a troubled childhood. Molesting young boys during slumber parties at the Neverland ranch – we seemed more disappointed than outraged. Never before has an alleged pedophile been given such grace. The court of public opinion basically gave him the equivalent of community service as instead of demanding his music no longer be played or all concerts cancelled, we let him off the hook with the only punishment being that he will be the punchline of the occasional joke. If a Catholic priest touches an altar boy, society is ready to burn down the Vatican. If Jacko repeatedly has overnighters in which he regularly forces himself on children we shake our heads but continue to tap our feet to PYT.
 
And I know it is commonplace to suggest that the real culprits in the molestation incidents were the parents who let their children stay the night with the human freakshow, and yes, they are to blame. But that doesn’t change the fact that Michael Jackson was a sick fuck. It isn’t like the parents were feeding their children to a wild tiger that was only following its instincts. Michael Jackson was a human being who used his fame and fortune to create an environment where he could destroy young boys as he saw fit. 
 
The CNN reporting of his death frequently showed clips of his videos and his childhood. There was much discussion over his upcoming projects and the comeback he was planning. It is only natural to reflect on the highlights of his work as most of us Gen X-ers and even Baby Boomers grew up with Jackson’s music as the soundtrack to our lives. The coverage of his hospitalization showed the legions of fans gathering in concern for their fallen idol. Tears being shed for their hero. But this was a hero who at best was a mere entertainer and at worst a monster. 
 
I am fully aware that my lack of sympathy may seem a bit harsh this early after his passing (technically I started writing this prior to the official announcement of his death). Do I feel sorry for his children now that they are without their father? No more sorry than I felt for them for just being his children. Maybe less so now – to be quite honest. 
 
When I came home and checked my Facebook, status updates were riddled with “RIP MJ” and “Be at peace now Michael.” The most disturbing were the ones that included something along the lines of “I don’t care what you say, he was a supreme talent” or “He may have had psychological issues, but he was musical genius.”  Issues? Issues are things like compulsively checking to see if you left the iron on, not having kids on your lap while you peruse pornography.
 
Michael Jackson may have been a one of a kind talent but as a disgusting representation of the worst of humanity, unfortunately he was all too familiar.

 

Not My Lover
 
About a month ago I wrote a daily wad which read: “A one sentence open letter to Michael Jackson: Dear Mr. Jackson, your limitless talent almost makes me forget that you’re an avaricious, reclusive, and grotesque child-molester. –CCO” Now that Jackson is dead, I feel a bit differently. But it is a hard feeling to place. It isn’t remorse for my harsh words. It isn’t loss. It isn’t nostalgia. It is a queer feeling of equal parts relief and forgiveness.
 
I feel a decided relief that the man is dead. Speaking as one who has worked with sexually abuse youth, I have very little sympathy for Jackson’s vices. It may border the cruel to say that I am relieved that he’s dead, but it is honest. He simply had too much power and too little accountability to be trusted.
 
But I also felt my own misgivings wash away when I heard that he had died. The pain he has caused to countless families hasn’t gone, but perhaps now they can begin the process of forgiveness denied them by buy offs and a legal system that privileges the rich. For the rest of us, the tragically monstrous icon now becomes the memory of tragedy.
 
His life can now be measured as a whole, and not through the lens of what he might be doing behind closed doors. Perhaps I’d feel the same way if he was in jail for life. But there is something about death that refocuses memory.
 
I do not think that history will vindicate him. But now Michael Jackson will be remembered for what he was and not what he is.
 
Jackson was the bridge from Motown to modern pop. He was among the greatest entertainers of all time. He changed the way that music occupied visual space. The man gave us Billie Jean! That song by itself ought to give us pause before summary judgment. He was savvy enough to buy the copyrights to all of the Beatles' music. In short, he was brilliant. Also add to this that he was arguably the most influential popular dancer of all time.
 
And, yes—tragically—he was a pedophile.

 

WWFD

by Stephen Ausburne

 

How then shall we live?  Isn’t that the key question for us all?  Regardless of the obstacles in your path – how to behave around your in-laws, how to throw away food discreetly, public restroom etiquette – one must always take the time to compare their behaviors in certain situations with the behaviors of a well respected and admired person of history.  If I wish to truly emulate another, I must learn to react to my stimulus in a way that would reflect this person’s potential decision making process.  First and foremost, one must choose a historical figure that is worth imitating.  Secondly, in order to successfully determine what it is that this person would “do” one must look long and hard at what this person “did.”  What better way is there to determine what someone is apt to do than to examine their past behaviors?  That is a rhetorical question for those of you wishing to write in.  For those of you who don’t know what rhetorical means, let me save you the trouble of activating your iPhone dictionary app, it means: “trust me, I’m right on this one, I only pretend to give you the option to answer so move on.”

 

I want my life to be reminiscent of a person who is relevant today even though their time of initial impact may have been long ago.  I want to live like someone whose style was unorthodox.  Someone who lived by a different standard than that of the mainstream culture they were raised in.  Someone who dared to be a radical.  I’m sure you’ve guessed by now where I’m going with this – I know, I know, not very original.  But hear me out.  This man went by many names.  Some called him Arthur Fonzarelli, but I called him the Fonz.  Fonzie represented rebellion with a heart.  He wasn’t all about living by their rules, he was about leather jackets, motorcycles, and riding motorcycles with a leather jacket on.  He was cool when cool wasn’t cool -- it was bad -- back when bad was not yet good but not altogether bad either.  He was so cool that he was played by Henry Winkler and we didn’t care because he was the Fonz.  Let’s take a step back for minute here…isn’t Henry Winkler like the most uncool name in the history of names?  He could have been played by someone named Giggles McTurdface and it still would have sounded better than Winkler. 

 

Alright Steve, Fonzie is cool, we can all agree on that, but how do we apply his teaching to our lives?  Let’s be honest with each other, supernatural powers like starting a jukebox with your fist may not be something tangible to aspire to, but that doesn’t mean we can’t make the effort to live in a Fonz-like fashion.  The Fonz scared people with his style – which says something because he was like some 5’5” thirty year old guy who hung out with high schoolers and called the bathroom “his office.”  Not exactly a picture of intimidation.  Creepy perhaps, but not someone to admire, that’s for sure.  That said, when Fonzie talked, people listened.  When Fonzie snapped his fingers, people stopped.  When Fonzie said to sit on it, people sat on whatever it was they were supposed to sit on.  He carried himself with confidence and the masses reacted.  Keep in mind that I’m talking about Fonzie in his prime.  Not the Fonzie that was the only guy left from the original Happy Days cast and ended up taking over Arnold’s and kept trying to shoehorn himself into the jeans that the wardrobe department still hung on to because someday the Smithsonian might want them for their Golden Age of Television Exhibit.  Definitely not the Fonzie that jumped over a shark with his motorcycle.  Although, on paper, jumping over a shark with a motorcycle sounds like the coolest thing ever but, unfortunately, something was lacking in the execution.  I’m talking about the Fonzie before he went commercial and his mug was on every lunchbox and t-shirt in town.  (I did have a Fonzie action figure – it was in no way a doll mind you– and when you pulled a lever on his back his thumbs went up.  If only I could have had the gift of prophecy and seen the word E-Bay written on a wall by a divine finger, I would have never surrendered that sweet bit of pop culture idolatry).

 

As a Fonzie apologist I constantly have to defend my loyalty.  I am up for any challenge put forth by the Chachi followers out there.  They may be small in number but they do exist.  Joannie may have loved him, but he did nothing for me.  Chachi is a false Fonzie and a one dimensional character at best.  The Fonz was complex, he demonstrated that it isn’t always easy to keep your emotions in check, but sometimes you have let go to truly be macho.  I’ve seen Fonzie cry, and for that I am a better man.  I’ve also seen Fonzie do an awkward little Russian dance to help Joannie win a dance contest, and for that I am in counseling.  

 

I’m not saying that if we were all like Fonzie that it would be goodbye grey skies, hello blue, but if some of us would dig deep down to find and nurture the inner Fonz these happy days could truly be yours and mine.  Wow, Happy Days.  I’ve always just accepted the title of that show without question, but come on, Happy Days?  I’m lost for words here.  Good Times came along later and that title was essentially saying the same thing but in a less syrupy sweet way.  When the show’s producers sat down to come up with the title I could just imagine the final meeting:

“We have this idea for a show.  It takes place in the 50’s back when days seemed, you know, a lot happier.  We’ve narrowed the options for the title down to these three:  Fun Moments, Happy Days, or Everybody’s White.”

“Fun Moments doesn’t work.  And as for the last one, well, we just signed Pat Morita to play Arnold.”

“Happy Days it is then!”

The rest was history. 

 

The bottom line is that Fonzie was cool and by and large, we are not.  We must learn that there is a time to laugh and a time to cry.  A time to lift one thumb and a time to lift two thumbs.  A time to comb your hair and a time to recognize that it’s perfect just how it is.  A time to jump over a shark with your motorcycle and a time – well, I guess there’s never actually a time for that in retrospect so scratch that.  How then shall we live, I ask?  If you answered “to live cool,” then I would have to say that you are correct-o-mundo.

 

 

 

The following is an editorial from an edition of the Cloud City Times published a long time ago.  The views represented do not necessarily reflect those of Cuture-Voice.com (mostly because they are fictional and written by a complete dork).
 
Isolation is Not a Crime
by Lobot
 
Let me say that I have been a resident of Cloud City for many years and I have seen a lot of changes, some good, some bad. Today concerned citizens like myself have had it with the Galactic Empire and feel like secession is the only way to enjoy the quality of life Bespinites deserve. I’m not suggesting engaging in some sort of Civil War or joining the Rebel Alliance, that would be suicide. What I am saying is that we need a leader that would be willing to give up his own friends in order to keep the Empire from intruding on Cloud City business. 
 
That leader is Lando Calrissian.
 
I know his past is suspect. A former smuggler and notorious gambler he may be, but right now he is the best choice we have. And we better get used to it, because tomorrow he will be announced as our new Baron Administrator (word is he won the title in a game of sabacc but a win’s a win). Having had a chance to sit down with the B.A.-elect I gleaned a great deal of insight from a meeting we had walking through the Vapor Room.
 
Calrissian is the people’s Baron. He understands the importance of keeping gas mining in the Anoat System and not outsourcing to Toloraan or that Sith hole known as Kril’dor. He is a champion for diversity as he is in favor of loosening restrictions on Ugnaught immigration in addition to promoting fair wages for the unskilled, snouted laborers. As my readers know, I am a champion of Ugnaught rights and I challenge anyone who thinks that they need to speak our language and assimilate or “go back to Gentes.” I ask those people, who is going to compress the carbonite and work the Tibanna gas mines? You? I think not. You complain about them taking jobs away from hard working Bespinites but you know full well you wouldn’t have it any other way. It’s convenient to act high and mighty when your casinos and luxury hotels thrive on the infrastructure supported by the laborers working in the lower levels. They work hard so you don’t have to. 
 
But I digress.
 
Calrissian is also proactive on the environmental front. He is committed to finding ways to harvest renewable alternatives to Tibanna gas as we all know that our beloved gas giant won’t stay a giant for long. He has already proposed a significant conservation effort that involves recycling carbon freeze residue into a reusable chilling process for keeping the City’s malt liquor supply, as he puts it, “cool and in perfect hibernation.” Critics have suggested that this isn’t a sustainable measure, but Calrissian has gone on record saying that it “works every time.”
 
All that isn’t to say that Mr. Calrissian does not have his faults. I am not a fan of his proposed dress code. He can sport the cape, it’s his prerogative, it’s the way that he wants to live. He can do just what he feels. No one can tell him what to do. Because what he be doing, he’s doing for you. I am willing to let him revamp the Baron Administrator wardrobe, it’s just that as a member of his staff, he wants me to wear puffy sleeves and that just isn’t my thing. I don’t want to be a pirate.
 
The bottom line is this: With Calrissian we have a shot at finally being the autonomous collective that we often dreamed of. The Empire is engaging in wars on foreign soil – or tundra in the case of the Hoth invasion – and their reign is destined to come to an end. In the meantime we need to distance ourselves and obtain some sort of neutrality lest we end up like the Endor takeover with the famed “Ewok and Awe” military campaign that devastated the small moon. I’m not suggesting that Lando can single-handedly reverse the effects of galactic warming but he is the change we need.
 
Barpotomous Drebble has responded to the above article:
 
Lobot’s bleeding heart is a tired act, perhaps his cranial computer is screwed on a little too tight. His support of this scoundrel is a new low for him and shows that he is drinking the Kluuq Aid along with the rest of Cloud City’s elite. Lifting the Ugnaught restrictions is a step toward weakening our borders (yes I know we are a floating city and we don’t technically have borders but you get my point). Don’t get me wrong, some of my best friends are Ugnaughts, I just think that they have to work here the right way. Distancing ourselves from the Empire is madness. Say what you will about their policies, but they are well organized and promote the very free market system that we Bespinites have grown accustomed to. Palpatine may be advanced in age, but he is not out of touch as many of his critics claim. He is experienced in politics and understands the importance of a good defense. Word is he is working on a new space station to replace the old one, I believe it is being proposed as the Freedom Star.
 
Lobot offers this rejoinder:
 
Drebble is a fat nerfherder.

 

If I had a Grammar: Tracking Orality in a Literate Culture
by A. Le Donne
 
I admit from the start that I am Californian. This means that there is an eight hour time difference between me and the Queen’s English. Americans descend from pilgrims who left England with the hope of a more relaxed grammar. Californians descend from wagoneers who left the East Coast to pan for an even more relaxier grammar. Don’t even get me started on Hawaiians.
 
All of the above have literacy in common. [Insert jingoist joke here.] This is to say that the English-speaking world inherited a particular default position: when we think of words we imagine letters of the alphabet rather than phonetic structure. This doesn’t mean we are incapable of thinking or acting orally, it just means that orality isn’t our default position.  
 
Contrast this to the days of Lao Tzu, Homer, the Bible, and almost every pre-printing press culture. In short, grammar was born, crafted, and performed in largely illiterate societies. Even when words were written down, they were meant to be read aloud. Me—without a keyboard and spell check, I'm about as coherent as that "I love you" dog on youtube.
 
Still an oral culture exists among English-speakers and it is untamed by grammatical imperialism.  I attempt to observe it here for the first time.  Prepare yourself for a feral rumpus along the squalid underbelly of the English language.
 
Perhaps the easiest way to track English orality is to camp out next to jump roping children.  Here is an example of our subject:
 
Miss Mary had a steamboat.
The steamboat had a bell.
Miss Mary went to Heaven.
The steamboat went to
[Hell.=“Hello]
operator, connect me number nine,
and if you disconnect me,
I’ll paddle your
[Behind.”=Behind]
the refrigerator,
there was a piece of glass.
Miss Mary sat upon it
and cut her little
[ass.=Ask]
me no more questions.
I’ll tell you no more lies.
The boys are in the bathroom
zipping up their
[flies.=Flies]
are in the meadow.
The bees are in the park.
The boys and girls are kissing
in the D-A-R-K dark, dark, dark!
 
If you’re American, I will bet my right ear that you’ve heard this song before, probably dozens of times.  I will bet my left one that you’ve never seen it written before. (By the way, that last sentence can only be true once per person. So don’t get greedy, you truth-hogs.)  This song is a bit of American English that has existed in oral form for at least four generations.  My only clue for dating it is from the reference to telephone and zipper technology.  It has remained remarkably stable due to the tune and meter which carries it.  We call this a mnemotechnique. By "we", I mean people with a bigger vocabulary than you.  By "you", I mean you.
 
But what is most scandalous here is that this song simply repels textuality.  As shown by the bracketed words, this song hinges on phonetic puns that only work when sung quickly.  What I have been forced to render as [ass.=Ask] is meant to be a single word with double meanings and functions.  It is both the penultimate word of one sentence and the opening word of another.  It is both a noun and a verb.  It manifests two spellings simultaneously!  Will the madness never end?  This is a poem that is altogether ruined by text.
 
Or consider a more familiar example. This is an excerpt from the courtroom transcript that documents my co-worker’s daily gossip-milling.
 
Her: “…and then Ricky complained to her that I’m always late.”
Me: “hm.”
Her: “Can you believe that?  Ricky is late just as much as I am!”
Me. “hmm.”
Her: “It’s just that Ricky doesn’t start the meetings until he gets here. And then, the meetings are always off topic.  But that is a whole nother thing…”
Me: “Mm-hmm.”
 
Notice the phrase “a whole nother”. Or should I write it “a-whole-nother”? Nother? Nother may be the most common word in American English which has absolutely no textual representation.  If you’re American, you’ve likely heard this phrase thousands of times. If you’re Californian, you’ve probably used this phrase two dozen times this week.
 
Somewhere along the way, the word “another” was spliced by the word “whole”. [Please pause for grammatical irony.] Yet, even with the rampant informality of the internet and text-happy cell phones, I’ve never seen anybody write “a whole nother” as such. For some reason, our literacy-default will not allow such a blatant oral form to enter the world of the written.
 
Then there is the opposite problem of mainstreaming Ebonics. White people tend to notice the oral grammar of Black English more so than their own. So you might run across a t-shirt that says “Don’t Hate the Playa” or “Hammer Don’t Hurt ‘Em!”  As if intentional phonetization somehow captures the oral vitality of the phrase. Look, M.C. Hammer is a treat to be enjoyed in all neighborhoods, but trying to duplicate Black orality in textual form makes an ass out of both you and Hammer.
 
The truth is that English not only has multiple grammars according to regional preferences (ask a Brit sometime how they feel about split infinitives or mixed metaphors), but each region also has a preferred oral grammar.  For every region-specific written grammar, there is a parallel oral grammar to be found. Oral grammar in California is completely tolerant of prepositions at the end of sentences and largely intolerant of “whom” and “shall”.  Saying “whilst” may easily result in a drive-by shooting. [If reading this aloud, please insert “can” for “may” in the previous sentence—then duck.]
 
My personal oral fixation is with the word “like”. According to my wife, I say “like” with the frequency of a 1980’s valley girl. I am powerless to defend myself because I am completely oblivious to my own oral idiosyncrasies. For all I know, I also have a proclivity for spoon gagging. I don’t write “like” when I’m emailing, yet there it is whenever I open my pie-hole.
 
Having lived in England for a time, I became more aware of my oral tendencies. I’m not one of those goons who accidentally mimics accents, but I do tend to mimic grammar.  I did my best to curb my “likes” and “nothers” for a little while. That is, until I realized the true beauty of Californian orality. We Californians may have no idea how to inflect “who” when it becomes a dative, but it turns out that power trumps principle. We be the media capital of the world. So eat your heart out, BBC!  Eventually, even the Queen will be setting her watch to Hammertime.